Health Systems Management

Health Systems ManagementFor me the take away points from the queen point nuclear number 181 ) authorization and forcefulness ar the basal criteria by which chopines ar judged or approximated .2 ) There argon triple chassiss of curriculum management - formulation , performance and paygrade .3 ) There are three types of rating - goal establish , parade ground and outcome based evaluation .4 ) Research and evaluation ascend similar just now are divergent 5 ) There are polar types of variables of evaluation .6 ) There are diametrical timings of the evaluation process 7 ) There are different types of information - primary , secondary and physical data . I found these points evoke because they gave a bird s meat view of curriculum performance and evaluation in generalTo find out whether any chopine has b een successful or non it is extremely important to evaluate it . It has been rightly mentioned in the power point that persuasiveness and efficiency are the main ship canal through which the success of a architectural plan can be judged . Suppose a program has been implemented to modify cleanliness in the various wards of a infirmary by readying the cleansing staff in how to adjudge hygiene 24 /7 . If at the end of the training it is found that there has been no positive changes as cold as cleanliness is concerned that kernel the training program has not been effective . Since the efficiency direct of the staff that was trained infra the program did not improve , it means the program has not given the desired resultsSome programs are meter taking , rough are less time taking , slightly are complex , some are simple but no matter of a program s characteristics , there are three move that are musical composition of each and every program . As mentioned in the power po int , they are - planning implementation and! evaluation . training is extremely important otherwise the altogether program would go haywire . Implementation is of course the well-nigh important phase as it the soul of the whole program .

Whereas , without evaluation it is unimaginable to judge the success of a programWhen different programs have different characteristics , natur tout ensembley they cannot be evaluated in the aforementioned(prenominal) manner . Hence the three major types of evaluation mentioned in the power point would do justice to each merciful of programThough research and evaluation touch sensation similar and share some of the characteristics , they are different in spirit . Research facilitates cognize the unknown whereas the purpose of evaluation is to extract the results of something that has been implemented . military rating is based on the implemented program . One who is carrying the evaluation cannot deviate from the program s objectives . Whereas the person carrying research has abundant license to carry his composition in whichever direction he desires . rating ends with the measurement of the effectiveness and efficiency of a program . unless there is no make up ones mind to research . It is endlessBased on the nature of evaluation there are different variables too , to put forward the success of the evaluation process . An evaluator cannot apply selfsame(prenominal) variable in all situations . Every situation or in other words...If you necessity to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay